HO HO HO *GENTLE* *GIANT*
While many a fan of rock music may be familiar with Yes, ELP or King Crimson (likely regarding them in a negative light, as the bands that punk rock had to slay in order to save rock music or some garbage like that), it's far less likely for the average rock fan to have the faintest notion as to the existence of Gentle Giant. I know that I never heard of them until George Starostin reviewed them on his site in 2000 or so, even though I was quite the fan of good prog rock, and I likely suspect that most of those whom I know that have heard their works are in much the same boat. This relative anonymity has been both a blessing and a curse for the band - on the one hand, it has meant that Gentle Giant has never had much more than a small cult following, but on the other, it means that the few people who are familiar with the band have mostly been rabid supporters of them. GG is, in many ways, the perfect band for somebody who thinks normal rock music is a bunch of low-talent garbage, but is still interested in the use of rock instrumentation to create "good" (read: complex) music. Furthermore, they didn't carry much of the baggage that came with the attempts of so many other prog groups to create mystical atmospheric experiences - they could be accused of pretentiousness if you wanted to, but they could never be called D&D-obsessed fruity wusses, as so many people are so quick to stereotype every other prog band in existence.
So basically, the band is a boon for a hardcore prog-a-holic (and might be a bane for prog-haters, if only enough prog-haters knew who they were). But what about for somebody like me, who neither reveres prog rock as better than 'normal' rock, nor dismisses it as the mistake so many others do? What about somebody who likes and respects well-done prog rock as an essential part of the development of rock music, but that doesn't let this like of prog affect his love of Let it Bleed? Well, I'm somebody like me, and my answer is that I find Gentle Giant very interesting ... sometimes. Actually, truth be told, I find them interesting pretty danged often, though it's rare for my feelings to go much beyond that. Outside of some nice moments in the first two albums, the number of times when GG is able to seriously trigger feelings in my soul (as opposed to my brain, you see) can probably be counted on one or two hands, and that says something; even mid-70's King Crimson, mathematical and soulless it might have been most of the time, still had Starless, whereas GG is never (ok, rarely) able to pull off a feat like making a drum line cause my lip to quiver and my tear ducts to start getting irritated.
Still, it's no crime to only trigger my brain instead of my heart and brain together (or if you're going to be pedantic about it, my emotional and analytical sides together) - the number of artists that can do both on a consistent basis is relatively small, and pulling off one of the two is no mean feat. Gentle Giant often was VERY interesting, throwing so many ideas into relatively short time lengths that it's mind-boggling. Seemingly any style or genre that could be incorporated was incorporated, any instrument that could be used was used (none of the members were instantly identifiable as virtuosos, but all were solid and able to play several instruments), and any possible time-signature or key change that could be made was made. Sometimes this worked marvelously, sometimes this bordered on unlistenable, but always this showed the band trying to challenge themselves and the listener. Sure, the band often let 'clever' trump 'inspired' in their writing processes, letting the bizarre technical features supplement any sort of decent songwriting base, but the cleverness often pulled them through on its own.
Anyway, the band gets a 3/5 from me, with several albums that get a definite thumbs up from me (and one, Octopus, that's one of my favorite prog rock albums of all time). The brothers Shulman (Derek the lead vocalist, Ray the bassist and violinist, Phil the all-purpose brass player and saxophonist, not to mention his great voice), keyboardist Kerry Minnear (and sometimes vocalist), guitarist Gary Green and the various drummers may not have had any particular songwriting genius amongst any individual, but as a unit they were certainly one of the more fascinating 'artsy' groups of the 70's. It should also be noted that their albums are all relatively short - while this means that the inevitable filler takes up a good chunk of many of their albums, it also means that the good moments (and believe me, there's a LOT of them) stand out that much more on the albums, boosting my post-listening impressions more than a bit.
PS: A BAND RATING OF 3/5 SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS A "C" OR WHATEVER - IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.
What do you think of Gentle Giant?
Paul Benstead (Paul.Benstead.eu.panasonic.com) (10/05/08)
Having read your entire review page for all the GG albums I can only
assume you're not really a fan.I was well out of senior school when
GG's first album was released and have all of their albums,and still
play them to this day.The music grows on you,very very slowly.
I like all types of rock and prog rock,but most of it seems so
ordinary when compared to GG.I've just purchased GG at the GG
dvd,which I recorded from the radio when it was broadcast,(alas no
video recorders in those days),it brought back a lot of memories,it
has a nice sleeve note from one of our radio presenters as
well,Stuart Maconie,a fan from a very early age.
Having said all this though,it's the only review of the band I've
ever read where the reviewer has at least taken the time to listen to
all the subject matter.Well done.
In another ten years or so you may rewrite your review of GG,it could
read very differently......I hope.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
I discovered this wonderful band through another wonderful band,
Spock's Beard. I was watching the Making Of V DVD and there is a song
on V called "Thoughts Part 2" which Neal Morse describes a few times
as their "Gentle Giant" song (it has some lovely counterpoint vocals
in it). So I thought I should check this band out. How right I was!
Brilliant stuff, unlike anything else. When asked to describe their
music, I can only describe it as Gentle Giant.
I find their career divided into three distinct periods - the first 4
albums with Phil Schulman, the next 4 (for me, the classic period)
and the last 3 where they try to go pop and succeed to a degree. As
you can guess, my favourite albums are "In A Glass House", "The Power
And The Glory" and "Free Hand" (though all of the first 4 are mighty
close). The last 3 are good, but I feel it's a shame they felt they
had to go that way musically. Don't get me wrong, I love good pop
music (and a lot of it IS good), but these guys were something
special, had a sound that was unique and for me it is a shame they
had to sacrifice their uniqueness for commercial reasons (it didn't
work anyway).
All in all they would have to be in my top 10 favourite bands and
that is saying something because I have a very large and varied
collection of music I love.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
This band is certainly not for softies. To appreciate Gentle Giant you must
be able to stomach a bit. Fortunately I can. Moreover I don't agree that
expanded and non-tonality only can appeal to the brain. Russian composers
belong to the most emotional ones. Still many of them did not restrict
themselves to pure tonality, but went much, much further than GG ever did.
I'll give a few examples of GG's emotionality in the album reviews.
The approach of this band was exactly the opposite of Blackmore's and
Emerson's. These two took classical themes and made them rock; GG took
pop/rock themes (of themselves) and subjected them to all techniques of
classical composing they could think of. That's courtesy of Kenny Minear I
guess, who got a degree in composition at the Royal Academy of Music in
London. He wrote all the GG-compositions down on sheets, which is highly
exceptional in pop/rock. Most musicians don't even bother to learn how to
read notes. Not that GG was a Kenny Minear Experience, far from it. The
background of the Shulman brothers was R&B and soul while Gary Green was an
open minded bluesrock guitarist and they were equally prominent. Only the
drummers were more or less faceless. This was a bit typical: nobody would
call Bill Bruford, John Bonham, Ian Paice or Cozy Powell faceless.
Incorporating so many diverse influences was asking for trouble in the
department of coherence of course. This plagued especially the first two
albums. Phil Shulman's proposed to make concept albums. Though the themes
were usually vague - a story line was not always there - this helped the
band enormously to focus. The result was now and then astonishing. The point
I made on the Yes page is nicely confirmed. None of the band members are
virtuoso's, like Yes and Deep Purple Mark II. GG indeed makes Yes look like
the Monkees - not because of technical skills, but with complex music. Yes
basically are a bunch of simple, straightforward rockmusicians. GG is
anything but that.
One influence that is usually not mentioned - and perhaps the band didn't
intend - was neoclassical music, from about 1920-30. Examples are Hindemith
and Milhaud and also some works of Stravinsky. This explains the band's
usage of glissando's for instance, something very rare in pop/rock.
Though I learned quite late about GG, I was already past 40, the band has
become one of my all time favourites. Like McFerrin I have to thank George
Starostin for it, even though I don't quite share their views on the band,
especially regarding Interview.
GG is a band for those who can appreciate both rock and modern classical
music. For those who only want to rock GG is too complex and dissonant; for
those who only are interested in classical music GG rocks too much or is too
poppy. That's a shame, because at their best the band indeed manages to
combine the best of two worlds - maybe more if we also consider the jazz
influences etcetera. I place them in the same league as UH, Led Zep and Deep
Purple (remember, I'm a supersnob, so I appreciate both well done bad taste
and complicated good taste). DP for me is In Rock until Made in Japan; GG
for me is Octopus, Interview, Playing the Fool and a whole string of other
great songs. I certainly think higher of GG than of ELP and Yes.
Sean Baldwin (sdbgtown58.gmail.com) (08/13/15)
I am a prog-rock lover as are most of my friends. Growing up in the 70s and 80s we listened to Yes, Pink Floyd, King Crimson and Gentle Giant and many others. We have been what you call ,rabid fans, from day one. Every person in every band has a different skill level so I won't bother to catagorize one from another. Different strengths and sounds as well. Just sit back and enjoy the wonderful music that they left for us. Why contrast and compare when you can just rock... thanks, Sean.
Best song: Funny Ways or Alucard
Of course, sometimes even the good songs have aspects that probably could have been thought through a little better. The opening Giant, unfortunately, doesn't rock anywhere near as hard as it could in the hands of (you guessed it) King Crimson; the effective basslines, the organ swirls, the good guitar lines and the bizarre vocal melody are all fine contributions, but they're undercut by (a) Derek Shulman's decision to not put any oomph (or a growl or anything) into his vocal delivery and (b) production that minimizes the impact of the aforementioned positive characteristics. However, the mid-song instrumental passage, with a bunch of lovely minimalist organ and mellotron lines overlaying a nice bassline, intertwined with nice vocal harmonizing and majestic brass, is definitely unique in mood to the band, and makes the song incredibly worthwhile to me.
The "good-but-flawed" category also inclues Nothing at All, one of the few instances in the GG catalogue where the band goes for an 'epic' time-length (over 9 minutes - mid-length for Yes, but an eternity for GG). The opening two minutes are one of the most beautiful two minute stretches the band ever put out, with amazingly lovely vocal harmonies over a perfect pop ballad melody and mystical acoustic guitar lines, and then after that builds into a more 'rocking' version that would work just fine as a climax to the piece ... but then it turns into a nastily ugly electronic drum solo (with some piano tinklings under it near the end). ARRRGH. Yeah, it ends up going back to the original lovely melody, but man that solo leaves a nasty aftertaste. And it's unfortunately not helped tremendously by the more 'rockin' Why Not?, which has good basslines but nothing else particularly crunchy or rousing about it (though the softer sung parts are lovely). And come to think of it, the closing 1:40 The Queen (a totally random cover of God Save the Queen) doesn't seem particularly necessary, though not particularly nasty.
Fortunately, the other three tracks, sandwiched between Giant and Nothing at All, rule immensely. Funny Ways is a magnificent ballad (mostly sung by Phil Shulman, whose voice is lovely beyond words and a good contrast to Derek), with the band making good use of its versatility by mixing the regular acoustic guitars with cellos (remember, all instruments are fair game with this band). Plus, the song eventually becomes amusingly upbeat, driven by neat piano lines with trumpets on top, then becomes majorly anthemic by combining these trumpets with a fabulous guitar break. Not bad for four freakin' minutes.
Where Funny Ways shows off the band's strengths in more delicate material, Alucard shows how great the band can be in the instances where it ups the intensity. The main synth riff is absolutely KILLER, both in notes and tone, and Kerry does a great job of augmenting it as necessary to make the accompanying saxophone and guitar parts that much more powerful. Add in a lot of great organ parts and a bunch of distorted vocals fading in and out during the sung parts, and you have the first GG song that ever made me sit up and go "WOW, these guys are really cool!"
Speaking of 'cool' (or in this case, 'cold' - whee, I love stretching for segues), the final part of this glorious trifecta is a moody, playful ballad entitled Isn't it Quiet and Cold? Phil's back on lead, singing a delicate vocal melody while bunches of violins (plucked), cellos, electric piano and glockenspiel do their thing underneath. This song actually passed me by the first couple of times I heard it, and I guess I dismissed it because it was so relatively unpretentious, but I hope you won't make the same mistake. Anybody seeking proof that GG didn't just use all these instruments just because they could, but actually had a purpose and focus to what they were doing, should use this track as exhibit A.
So anyway, it's a fine debut, and my #2 for the band overall. There are problems, but the brilliant stuff is no less so than the brilliant stuff on later albums, and that should be enough.
brian.mail.math.ucsb.edu (12/15/03)
This is a good way to be introduced to the band. These songs are still
sufficiently whacky, but pales in this aspect compared to later efforts. Also,
apart from the drum solo, there no real dissonance.
The title track gives a nice introduction to the band's style, showing the
band's complex and tight style, especially through the
beginning "riff"/section. And, of course, it is multisectioned. It may seem
that the pieces don't belong together, but somehow it just gels together. Even
better is "Alucard". It definitely gets across that errie feel they desired
with the treated vocals and spiky horns, the grumbly synth riff, and the
little 'spooky' guitar figure. It definitely tops KC (if only once) at its game
here. "Funny Ways" may be one of GG's finest ballads, being very pretty (nice
vocals, atmosphere, and guitar solo). I always took "Isn't It Quiet and Cold?"
as a throwback piece to the 20's or 30's, probably due to its dominant
instrumentation (acoustic guitar, cello, and violin) and Phil's singing. And,
quite a cute xylophone solo!
Unfortunately, the rest isn't nearly as strong as what I haave just mentioned,
though I enjoy still enjoy most of it (except for the center of "Nothing at
All"). Special mention to the lovely medieval section and bluesy sections
of "Why Not". Overall, I give this album a 10(13). It's probably my #1 GG
album, though "Octopus" comes very close (if I only liked "River" more!), since
it's perhaps the most consistent all the way though with minimal unnecessary
dissonance.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
A great debut. Not their finest work but very fine indeed (very few
bands' first albums are their best and those whose are usually don't
have long careers in my experience). I can't see the strong
resemblance to In The Court... That you do, however. "Funny Ways",
for example, can't really be compared to "I Talk to the Wind" in that
the latter song doesn't have the explosive middle section that "Funny
Ways" does. "Alucard" bears some superficial resemblances to
"Pictures of a City" but only superficial. Also, there's nothing on
this album to compare with "Moonchild" (which some may see as a plus,
I like "Moonchild") and "Isn't It Quiet and Cold?" is far jauntier
and jollier than anything the Crim boys would do, perhaps more
comparable to a Giles, Giles and Fripp song if anything.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
The debut album particularly shows that the band had plenty of original
ideas, but had problems to blend them in something cohesive. The big
exception is Funny Ways, but the live version is so much superior I will
neglect it here. The opening track shows how nice independent bass players
are. Ray Shulman said in an interview that he saw no reason to restrict
himself to rhythmic play. So we get all kind of countermelodies. My
objection is the swift and sometimes artificial changes in mood. I like the
aggressive approach though - and remember, aggression is also an emotion.
Isn't it Quiet and Cold is a favourite of mine, such a beautiful up-tempo
ballad, with influences from jazz, vaudeville amongst others and again
fantastic bass lines. Why not? combines an aggressive rocking riff with some
short barok-phrases on organ. The middle section as a contrast is quite
mellow. These guys knew how to balladeer for sure. The guitar solo contains
some variations on Hava Nagila, naturally ending in that aggressive riff
again. The almost generic barroom rock that works as a coda is also
perfectly right in place.
The other songs don't do much for me, too much incoherence. That includes
Alucard alas.
Best song: Pantagruel's Nativity or Edge Of Twilight
The album also features, in many ways, the best production that would ever be found on a Gentle Giant album, providing an incredible atmosphere in places that the band never even approached attempting again. The first two tracks are particularly impressive in this regard, and get the album off to an amazing start that largely carries the rest (in terms of giving this album such a high rating). Pantagruel's Nativity is beyond amazing, combining occasional ghostly synth lines with Phil's unbelievably beautiful voice (or is it Kerry? Gah, I can't tell those two apart) with a perfect guitar line over lovely mellotrons, then bringing in all these 'melting' group harmony lines with an abrasive guitar line and running through all sorts of nice variations of these parts (I'm especially fond of the echoey xylophone). Its seven minutes seemingly pass by in a heartbeat, with every idea fleshed out as much as it deserves but not overstaying its welcome, even if the song barely has any 'conventional' structure. Of course, the following Edge of Twilight has even less of a structure, but this one definitely can get by on atmosphere alone. A nice echoey Phil vocal, a clarinet occasionally mirroring it, some bizarrely processed soft vocals augmenting the sound at times, a cute dose of harpsichord and other things, before becoming dominated by some random tympanis are what you'll find here, one of the most perfect musical manfiestations of twilight imaginable (the other, naturally, is Twilight Time by the Moody Blues).
None of the other tracks come close to those, but some are quite good. The great production of those tracks makes an appearance in the middle of Wreck - that part from 1:52 to 2:10 or so, coming back around 3:45, with that incredibly echo-laden guitar part that fades off into the horizon at just the right times, with just the right amount of mellotron underneath - and helps transform a good pirate-themed track into a near masterpiece. Yeah, it's a generic piratey track at heart (I ripped ELP for their attempt at one in Pirates, so not hating this could be considered hypocrisy, I guess), but the lyrics aren't at all stupid, and the clever use of recorders in the breaks between alternating piratey vocal melodies definitely gets my approval. Black Cat is also a well-produced little 'ditty,' with all sorts of eerie guitar effects alternating with plucked violin strings alternating with vibes alternating with ... whatever. It gets a bit overboard with dissonance in the middle, but only a bit, and the way the plucked strings manage to emerge from all the random string scrapings once more playing the melody is a nice touch.
Of the other four tracks, I'd say that The House, The Street, The Room is the most enjoyable, combining a fairly intense vocal line with a good main riff, eventually culminating in a solid, lengthy guitar solo in the middle (over the riff played on distorted organ). The 30-second blurb where they just play every instrument in sight for a second or two is kind of lame, but it kinda reminds me of being in a dark room and crashing into everything you don't want to find before finding what it was you're looking for (ie in this case the guitar).
The other three tracks, unfortunately, aren't that great. The title track is just there - it's not long enough to be totally offensive, lasting only a minute and a half, but it seemingly serves no purpose except for the band to say, "Hey, you know how we can make dissonance interesting? Well, we're just as talented at making it boring as hell!" The Moon is Down isn't much either, except for a decently pretty (in parts) mid-section, and the closing Plain Truth (7-1/2 minutes, nyarrgh) is about twice as long as it should be, serving only to let Ray wank along on his electric violin. Ehn, if I want to hear an electric violin do weird things, I want it to be entertaining, like in the band's own River or in, I dunno, The House I Used to Live In off of Frank Zappa's Burnt Weeny Sandwich (my favorite Zappa album, you see) - here, there's too many parts that just seemingly have no purpose.
Still, weak ending or no, it doesn't mitigate the jaw-dropping start. Had they managed to keep up the pace of the first 30% of this album all throughout, this might be one of my favorite albums of all time - as is, I'll just have to be content with saying it's very, very good overall. Even if it's frustratingly inconsistent, as are most GG albums.
brian.mail.math.ucsb.edu (12/15/03)
Another really good album. In fact, I'm often tempted to place the first two
wonderfully atmospheric tracks as the best GG tracks ever. (And "Edge of
Twilight" has some more wonderful voals from Phil, almost having a Gregorian
chant aura about them.) But, unfortunately there are points on this album which
still grate on my nerves (the title track and the closing track). Also, the
middle of "The House, The Street, The Room" seems a bit overkill. (I must say I
like your analogy of this section before the guitar solo comes in!) Otherwise,
I'm quite pleased with this album. And the 'pirate' song is quite a hoot! Also,
may it be said that this album has a 'nocturnal" feel to most of it! 9(12).
Nick Pulliam (nickpulliam.resonetics.com) (01/23/06)
This is the first GG disk I ever listen too and if it wasn't for the
strength of the first two tracks I may not have have listenned to
anymore GG. The production of this album is first rate, but only a
few songs work for me as fun to listen to and memorable (the first 2
and "Black Cat" come to mind). I just havn't been able to get into
this album much and it is frustrating. I give it a low 6.
Sergei (swamprock.mail.ru) (02/28/07)
It was always difficult to me to be determined with a favourite disk
GG: "Acquiring" or "Octopus". Last time I am declined to the second
variant however at all I love "Acquiring" not less. This disk is
necessary for receiving 9. Unfortunately I never understood one of
the main songs from here "Edge Of Twilight", but "Pantagruel's
Nativity" I recognize as third on the importance a song of the Giant.
"Plain Truth" with these freaky "sliding" sounds - one more my
favorite from an album.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
The follow up is more ambitious (not that the debut wasn't) and can
make for hard listening for some.. Not me, though. You are right that
the first two tracks are probably the highlights, but I find most of
the album very enjoyable and challenging and I like music to
challenge me sometimes. Not always, which is why I have other music
in my collection.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
McFerrin is spot on when he discusses Pantagruel's Nativity. Note the spooky
harmonies, the wood instruments and the brass. Only very, very few songs in
the entire history of music have been better arranged. I also like the title
song very much. Of course it's a ditty, that's why it's so short. But it
delivers exactly what it's meant to deliver: a set of nice non-trivial
variations on a catchy theme.
The other songs leave me cold.
Best song: Schooldays
The opening Prologue gets things off to an ok start, establishing a twisted-but-interesting instrumental theme, then there's some very quiet vocal harmonies singing lyrics that establish the 'concept', and then there's ... more jamming. Some bass-organ dueting, with layers of keys added over time, then the opening comes back, then .. whatever. Truth be told, for a band of the calibre of Gentle Giant, this jam is fairly lacklustre, but it's still ok. The following Schooldays, however, is far beyond ok, easily one of my top five tracks from the band. It's quite complex, as are all GG songs, but here every last component feels like an essential element and not just something thrown in to satisfy whomever. The vibe-guitar duet theme is fascinating, the call-and-response vocal harmonies in the "verses" are something else, and then there's the mid-section. Kerry's piano lines here are some of the most atmospheric, melodic and all-out gorgeous piano lines I've ever heard in all of prog rock - blast it all, why couldn't have fate let Tony Banks have half of Kerry Minnear's sense of taste and restraint and ... arrgh, I'm getting off topic. The vocal melody and nostalgic lyrics in the mid-section are also knock-your-socks-off quality, especially the nice touch of having a younger Shulman brother contribute "kid" voices to the proceedings.
All things must pass, however, and the next three tracks present the friends as grownups. Working All Day is about the friend who became, well, a "working man," and is a fairly compact piece with a decent brass-guitar riff serving as the foundation, around which there's some decent organ and sax jamming. Whee. Peel the Paint starts quiet, with some nice string parts here and there, and then in the third minute the bassline gets louder, and then Derek does some bellowing over the (now 'rocking') instrumental work. Then there's a bunch of jamming (notice a common theme in this review?), highlighted by a terrific guitar solo. Yup.
Mister Class and Quality showcases the well-to-do friend, and it's ok, with another decent jam occupying the middle of the song (btw, the track divisions on the CD are wrong - Mister Class extends to about 2:30 of track six, as well as obviously occupying all of track five). I like the distorted organs and the wah-wah'd guitars. Yup. Just when I'm about to give up on the album and droop from the seemingly endless jams, though, comes the harmony-and-organ laden conclusion, the glorious title track. THERE's the bizarre dose of atmospheric catharsis that I'd been waiting for since, er, Schooldays (hey, give me a break, I got spoiled on the first two albums)!
In short, the album almost seems like a bit of a tossoff to me, but I don't mean that in a bad way - parts are brilliant, parts are alright, but overall it doesn't seem like the band spent an inordinate amount of time going over and "inaccessible"-izing every second of the album. That it's a slight tossoff is not a bad thing, though - it just means that the album's quite good, not much more, nothing less.
brian.mail.math.ucsb.edu (12/15/03)
Of the first four GG albums, this seems to stick out the least. Maybe it has do
do with some of the jams. Otherwise, this again is quite a solid effort. And,
yes, I love the ending of this album. Pure catharsis!! I also rather enjoy the
introductory theme to this album (too bad it really doesn't go anywhere).
Overall, this gets an 8(11) from me.
Nick Pulliam (nickpulliam.resonetics.com) (01/23/06)
This is a pretty good album wich is undermined by poor production, or
possibly a poor mastering and transfer to disk. The song "Three
Friends" is my favorite Gentle Giant song period. The pipe organ and
mellotron jam is a unique experience and should not be missed by any
fan of progressive rock. hopefully the sound can be improved if they
remaster or re-mix this album. I give it a low 8.
Sergei (swamprock.mail.ru) (02/28/07)
Damn itself! It was necessary to recognize that "Three Friends" as a
remarkable conceptual album. Unless you listen a song "Peel The
Paint" - do not hear all this energy and power (similarly to first
two albums), which on your words does not get to this disk? At least
it should be 8 (12) or... damn itself!
Goran Janicijevic (simplius.gmail.com) (05/27/07)
While Octopus might be objectively their best output, Three Friends is the
GG favourite of mine.
Medievalisms are almost absent here. Three Friends is a tasty stew of modern
counterpoint avantguarde, atmospheric music, psychedelic rock, funk,
victorian music and Debussy. The "Three Friends" coda is the most beautiful
GG piece ever written, and one of the highlights of the symphonic prog
genre.
The "kid" is not impersonated by Ray Shulman, but it is a real kid - the
oldest brother Phil's son.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
A concept album, even if the concept is fairly simple. The fact that
it is simple is good in my opinion because it doesn't detract from
the songs and the songs can be taken as individual pieces without
missing anything. "Prologue" and "Three Friends" are probably the two
that don't stand up quite as well for me, "Schooldays" is great with
that skip-along melody, really conjures up the idea of happy times at
school (wish I'd had some!) and the three songs for each of the
friends are all excellent. I probably like "Peel The Paint" best but
it's a close call. The one thing lacking for me on the album is what
was a plus for one of your other respondents - the lack of the
medieval touch on any of the songs.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
Three Friends is a step forward, mainly thanks to Phil Shulman. No matter
how superficial the concept is, it forces the band to group its ideas in a
logical, coherent way. It's a pity the ideas aren't that good this time, so
only Schooldays, Three Friends and Peel the Paint are really good. The
combination of coherence and brilliant ideas would only come the next album.
Again McFerrin is spot on when discussing Schooldays; I have nothing to add.
Three Friends is quite an aggressive boogy, varied with relaxing echoy
chanting, so contradicts his statement that the band drifts away from
emotionality. Peel the Paint would become even better on stage, so I refer
to Playing the Fool.
Best song: The Advent Of Panurge
The first side is simply incredible, led by Gentle Giant song #1 for me, The Advent of Panurge. The first forty-five seconds or so have Phil and Kerry singing a twisted (but strangely memorable) vocal melody with delightful harmonies, but just when you think it's not gonna get anymore interesting, this totally fascinating keys-guitar-bass groove pops up, which the band messes with in lots of fascinating ways. Then Derek chimes in with a brief snippet of the vocal melody over this groove, and then, oh man. The "look at my friend look around my friend" mid-section, with trumpets, all sorts of tempo and meter changes, then dissolving into another jam (with the band members muttering a bunch of random foreign words) is undoubtedly my favorite passage in any GG track. I find it fascinating when it's on, but even more impressively I easily find myself able to remember all the great themes when it's over, and will even find myself humming them on many an occasion. Then there's a return to the vocal melody of the start, then the dissonant theme pops up again, and they jam over that until the song ends with Derek bellowing, "My name is Panurge, and I have come from hell!" P.E.R.F.E.C.T.
Up next is Raconteur Troubadour, another of GG's best ever tracks. Derek's delivery is perfect for this song, as he sings one hell of a Tull-quality vocal melody (no idea why this sounds like Tull to me, it just does), while there's a great violin line that doesn't really have anything to do with the vocal melody (at least not in a way that would be obvious to a listener whose academic focus was something other than music composition) but fits in anyway. And there's a bunch of key playing that doesn't have to do with the vocal melody but also fits in anyway! Then there's trumpets, then there's a sort of awkward-as-hell (but the better for it) five second violin jig, then the catchy-as-hell discord comes back together again. ALL IN FOUR MINUTES. Likewise for the following Cry for Everyone, which has a surprisingly conventional (but still good) 'heavy' chord sequence played on guitar as its base (with a quality vocal melody to match) but then has a ton of great key lines (none predictable, all great) that go into a whack-ass band jam that go into another verse that go ... ah man, it just goes everywhere. Yet for all that it does, it doesn't lose me for a single moment.
The next track confirms my belief that the band had somehow tapped into some massive avant-prog zeitgeist that wouldn't let them screw up, no matter how awkward or clumsy the track should be by all sane accounts. Knots has to have the single most bizarre vocal harmony arrangement in the history of time, complimented by a bunch of seemingly random xylophone-led puttering (eventually led by loud, crashing piano) that should piss the hell out of me yet makes me bob back and forth with a smile on my face. The song seemingly reaches critical mass every five seconds or so, ready to totally break down and get thrown into the outtakes pile, yet it always pulls itself back from the edge, making me hum the vocal lines along with it.
The second half can't live up to the first, but it's still got its share of quality moments. I'm not totally sold on the instrumental The Boys in the Band, even though it has plenty of cool parts. I dunno, I'm almost guessing that it's the lack of sung parts, if only because the sung parts are much of what keeps up the 'accidental pop' facade in my head that makes me like the album so much. Whatever, it's a hoot while on, even if it's my least favorite of the album. A Dog's Life is better, a sort-of ballad with a lovely vocal melody over a simple acoustic guitar line, of course augmented with dissonant, strident cellos and given a whacky mid-section. It's quite nice, though not as jaw-dropping as anything from side one.
Think of Me with Kindness, graced with a lovely Kerry vocal, seems out of place here, with much less weirdness than elsewhere. It doesn't particularly go anywhere (even the instrumental break in the middle, led by a trumpet, just plays off the vocal melody), but it's quite nice, and I don't want to give the impression of the band suddenly getting a 'sellout' bug in the middle of the recording sessions - the odd (in a good way) melody in the middle is definitely something that most ballads wouldn't bother to include. But whatever, River closes things out, and whatever potential for a feeling of second-side letdown there might have been is, um, washed away (stupid unavoidable puns). The mix of an electric violin in my right ear and a wah-wah'd guitar in my left ear is definitely a sound I could stand to hear more in my life, and all the other elements, from vocal melody to great guitar soloing to production to nice "rivery" atmosphere, help make the album close out with a flourish.
So there you are. As far as I've been told, many Gentle Giant fans consider this the band's peak (at least, I hope that's true - heaven help me if I later find out Power and the Glory or Interview is supposed to be their best), and while hardcore fans of prog bands sometimes scare me, this is one time when I gladly shake their hands. So original, so fascinating ... and unfortunately, so long Phil, who took off after this album. A pity, that.
PS: For those who have followed the site for a long time, you'll be happy to know that I've avoided the curse surrounding my site that made me dread reviewing this album for a good two years. Happy days.
brian.mail.math.ucsb.edu (12/15/03)
This is incidentally the second GG album I was able to get into (having bought
the first four at the same time). This album has a strange sense of
accessibility for such often bizarre songs/structures. The first three tracks
are the high points of this album for me. I'm glad you gave mention to "Cry for
Everyone", as I really enjoy this one! Also worthy of mention are "Knots"
(which is actually involving once you find out its purpose) and "Think of Me
with Kindness" (still a lovely ballad). For some reason, I still don't care
for "River" in its entirety (probably has to do with the beginning riff and
vocals). Once it goes into the "rivery" atmosphere starts wiuth the
synthesizers (I think), then I enjoy every moment. In short, this is my second
favorite GG album: a high 9(12).
Nick Pulliam (nickpulliam.resonetics.com) (01/23/06)
Yeah the first three songs are outstanding in every way. Even Knots
is starting to grow on me, though I still find it hard to really like
it. "The Boys In The Band" is also pretty great. The rest dosn't do
to much for me, but the album gets a 9 based on the strengths of the
good songs.
Sergei (swamprock.mail.ru) (02/28/07)
I do not doubt that it is the best album Gentle Giant. "The Advent Of
Panurge" is a great prog-song, but I put above amazing "River" - this
masterpiece is one of best progressive brilliants of all time. But me
confuses that you have given to this album 10 (13) - it be necessary
to put 10 (15) (in my humble opinion).
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
For me, this is where GG really started to fully develop their
signature sound. The first half is hard to fault on any level and the
second half is only a little less inspired. My favourites on this
album are "The Advent of Panurge" and "Knots". Wittiest lyric has to
be "A Dog's Life" though. Although Phil was to leave after this one I
feel that this album paved the way for the next 4 albums in
particular (which I think the band themselves allude to in the lyric
for the song "Interview"). The start of some extraordinary music (as
if the first 3 hadn't been good enough).
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
Octopus was the first album of GG I heard and I was immediately floored. The
sheer amount of ideas and themes in compositions of 6 minutes at the max is
unmatched. Popmusic is essentially based on repetition. Not this album, so I
have wondered if this is still rockmusic.
It's also great that the members don't involve themselves in the virtuosity
ratrace. The ego trips of bands like ELP, Deep Purple and Led Zeppelin
balance sometimes on the border of annoyance and fascination. Not with GG.
Every note and every member of the band is completely in service of the
compositions. I can understand why not everybody appreciates River. It's the
only composition with a guitar solo of 1˝ minute, including wah-wah and
overdub. Most solo's on this album shouldn't be called solo's at all, as
they last just 10 seconds. The instruments alternate as quickly as in a
classical symphony - or quicker. The only thing I miss on this album is a
fugue, but the guys would remedy that a few years later.
The only complaint this album deserves is the high grade of intellectualism.
That should not be a problem at all for those who adhere the esthetics of
Stravinsky and Hindemith. Mine is, especially on this album, lack of
emotionality. It's there, but you'll only find it after a lot of listening
as it's buried deep down. Being a fan of pathetic stuff like Tchaikovsky and
Shostakovitch that bugs me a bit.
My favourite on this album is Knots. It's not avant garde at all, as it
firmly draws influences from several composers of Modern Classical Music:
the many shifts in accent, the on purpose ugly violin, the dissonances
solved in a harmonious chord immediately followed by a dissonant solo on
xylophone. The result is ass-kicking as any good hardrock/heavy metalband
did. It's as offensive as say You shook me from Led Zeppelin.
Boys in the Band is "just" a complex jam; great in itself, but a bit pale
compared to the four songs before. Moreover it's no match to the jams on
Made in Japan. Dog's Life has an untrivial (as always) and still quite
catchy and certainly very lovely melody. It's a bit simple though.
Think of me with Kindness is another masterpiece. I missed it more or less
the first time I heard it, overwhelmed as I was by everything that became
before. How can anyone maintain that GG lacks emotion when listening to this
tender song? How does GS mean not climactic? Listen to the brass again! No
matter how much I dislike the word heartfelt, but it certainly applies to
the vocals on this song.
The Advent of Panurge rules from the very beginning till the very last note.
But Raconteur Troubadour doesn't do that much for me. Of course it's a very
good song, but it relies to much on mood and not enough on music to my taste
- that's to say, compared to the other songs. On all other GG-albums bar one
it would be a highlight.
I already mentioned River. Nobody has noticed it yet, but the song shows how
a drum solo should be done. The other instruments repeat a stop-start theme
a couple of times. Pay attention to it or you'll miss it. It's there
immediately before the relatively lengthy guitar solo. The result is another
highlight. And guess what? This is still only my second favourite GG album.
Madan Mohan (madwiz.gmail.com) (09/13/11)
In the main, this is an excellent review, as your reviews usually are. But I must disagree with the use of words like accidental or
unintentional. I don't think there was anything accidental about it. Gentle Giant were outstanding composers and had a radically
different approach to prog rock from that of the other biggies. As you have yourself observed, they compress several amazing parts
into pop song lengths rather than pad them out over 20 minutes. It is worth noting here that the Shulmans had a pop hit before
they formed Gentle Giant. And the non-Shulman members, Green and Weathers, have hinted that the Shulmans always found the allure of that elusive pop hit hard to resist. I am guessing this conflicted with a rather obvious 'technical snobbery' and a desire to
challenge and unsettle listeners with their music. Which is why, far from sounding dry and dead for all ears but those of
musicians, their music is lively and holds your attention. They were able to contrive irresistible hooks but always wanted to
balance it with experimentalism.
Their music never seems to appeal much to the heart but I am not sure they'd have stood much chance of that with decidedly un-
charismatic voices like Derek's or Kerry's. Their formula indeed works better here than most of their other albums, except Free
Hand.
Best song: An Inmate's Lullaby
The main problems stem from the fact that the band decided to abandon the "slam tons of ideas into a short time period" approach for a "let's make the songs based on these ideas long" approach. Yup, the number of tracks has been cut to six, and four of them last over seven minutes; this is hardly a bad thing in and of itself, but in terms of keeping my interest throughout, the songs don't measure up to the lengthier excursions of, say, Yes. There are simply far too many moments on this album where the arrangements, while just as impressive technically as before, lull my head into a stupor and force me to fight the urge to nod off. It also hurts that the vocal parts aren't that good even by Gentle Giant standards - except for the lovely (and perfectly appropriate) delivery that Derek (I gotta admit, I was totally convinced this was Kerry until I found out otherwise. Mea culpa) gives in Inmate's Lullaby, it seems like the band (Derek especially) just included the sung parts for the sake of including them, without bothering to put any conviction behind them (which is a shame since, as mentioned earlier, the lyrics are just fine).
Still, every track on here has decent enough 'raw materials.' They may not be put to the best use, often interrupted with quieter parts that add little to my listening enjoyment, but I would be lying if I said that, when looking at the track listing, any of the songs make me gag and lament my precious lost seconds of life. I'm not big on Way of Life, which has a cool dancable (ha) foundation but little else (that is, little else that I like - there's a lot going on in the track, it's just that not much of it makes me care), but I gotta admit it's funny to hear such a thing on a prog album (especially when I know that the band saw it as complex prog and not as proto-disco). Aside from the pretty (but underdeveloped) A Reunion, though, everything has at least a few solid chunks of quality. The Runaway starts the album on an extremely high note, with a rhythmic groove formed out of samples of glass breaking (not making this up), then turns into what could be an excellent intense piece (with great tight work from everybody) with a fine vocal melody, but is instead dragged down by the total lack of effort from the vocals and extreme excess in the mid-song jam. Cut this to five minutes from seven, and I'd be a happy man - as is, I'm just a mildly content man.
The tracks bookending the second side are also quite good, though each has passages that I definitely think should have been left on the cutting-room floor. Experience starts off much like something from Octopus (both in style and quality), then eventually enters a fine groove (with a great guitar and bass line), but also meanders into generic (and in this case boring) medievalism too many times for my liking. Still, what a great groove, even if Derek's voice adds little. As for the title track, it more or less bypassed me the first eight times I listened to the album, but I think that was just a function of me being tired. A lot of it seems somewhat like Gentle-Giant-By-Numbers to me (though that's not necessarily a bad thing), but it gets great in the second half, where we suddenly get this killer hard rock groove that has bits of steel guitar here and there that closes out the album.
For all of the ambiguous praise that I can give most of the album, though, there is actually one track that I can't whine about. An Inmate's Lullaby is a perfect look inside the mind of somebody locked away in a mental institution, with odd processed Derek vocals, the best use of vibes you'll ever hear, and just such a bizarrely pleasant atmosphere that I can't help but love it. I actually almost get the feeling that Peter Gabriel, when putting together Birdy ten years later, took a listen or two to this track (if he didn't, and I'm guessing he didn't, the resemblance is freaky) - substitute the vibes for marimbas, lay on a grumbling static synth pattern and muffle the singing, and you wouldn't be that far from that mid-80's soundtrack.
So basically, it's a good album. Unfortunately, it's a noticable slip from the band's previous accomplishments - the complexity of melodies and arrangements is just as high as ever, but the ability to make the casual listener care about it is on the decline (though not gone by any means). If you're a hardcore prog fan, you might adore it, though.
brian.mail.math.ucsb.edu (12/15/03)
Looks like a fair rating for this album. I was a bit harsher on this album on
George's page, but time has mellowed my opinion on this a bit. On the most
part, the songs are fine here. It's just I think they're just a bit
unnecessarily complex/long this time around. That is probably why this doesn't
stick with me quite as well as their previous efforts. I really don't have too
much to add to your comments here except that the guitar tone on the first
track has a "glassy" sound to it (complementing the shattered glass?) that's
quite appropriate. Only the "medieval" schtick (feeling abused by the end of
the album) truly irks me. Otherwise, quite a decent and challenging album.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
I am one of those you allude to who rate this as their favourite -
well sort of. For me this album, The Power and the Glory and Free
Hand are their golden period and I am hard pressed to separate them.
"The Runaway", "Experience", "An Inmate's Lullaby" are the best but
they're all terrific stuff to me. It still amazes me that they
refused to release this in the US at the time but did release The
Power and the Glory as I think this is the more commercial album, if
any of GG's work prior to The Missing Piece can be described as
commercial.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
This is a minor let down for me. As so often after a (relatively) successful
album In a Glass House repeats the formula and is weaker. The main reason is
that there aren't as many brilliant ideas. As a result the album is not as
complicated. The uncompromising genius of Octopus is missing alas. Still In
a Glass House is very, very good.
The introduction of The Runaway is unbeatable of course. The jamming parts
are quite good, but tend to be repetitive indeed. That's not an objection if
the solists are virtuoso's, but that was never GG's strength. Especially the
guitar and keyboard parts are not completely convincing. They are good
enough though and do not really pull the song down. An Inmate's Lullaby is
brilliant again. The way the joyful moods, due to the vocal harmony, is
alternated with short and creepy bits is fascinating. This hints forward at
their masterpiece. The rhythms of Way of Life are way to twisted to make it
a dance tune. For me the song fails partly because melody is lacking. That's
even true for the organ/violin based middle section. The common criticism of
GG lacking emotional resonance is completely true here. The result is
intriguing, but nothing more. The majestic part after about 6 minutes can't
remedy, even if it's a highlight. Moreover the silly fade out spoils it.
Experience is an attempt to improve on The Advent of Panurge by adding
rhythms that are even more complicated. The result is an intriguing (again;
I think this word summarizes the album best), but not convincing wankfest.
The band simply forgets to put their ideas in service of the music, which is
alway their main strength. This is the wrong way for GG to kick ass. I like
the bits were Derek Shulman screams like a pseudo hardrockvocalist best. A
Reunion again is lovely and in itself very good - but we have heard that
moody tasty violin before. The song doesn't really add anything to previous
achievements. Fortunately it's quite short.
The intro of the title song is excellent: complicated and non-trivial. It
also has the best jam of the album and some fine riffs. I love it how the
band threatens to boogie, but immediately spoils it with some rhythmic
twist.
Despite the disagreements I concur that In a glass House is very good. It's
just not brilliant.
Best song: Aspirations
The trendy choice for the worst offender is So Sincere, and I heartily agree with the WRC mob. I read an interesting comment on the Starostin site that said the track reflects "twisted logic and disingenuous political rhetoric," and thus matches the subject well with the loose, non-sensical structure and melody. Well, he may be right. And I just can't get myself to care (even though juxtapositions between subject matter and song approach often float my boat) - this is four minutes of pure discodant torture, almost sounding like a bad parody of the best Octopus moments. If you like it, good for you - as for me, I have enough things in this world to give me horrid headaches. Along those lines, I'm also not fond of Cogs in Cogs at all. Honestly, it sounds like something Genesis would have come up with on a really, really, really, really bad day, with the guitars buried in the background (playing some nice lines here and there) while Kerry wanks all over the place with keyboards that don't help much at all.
Fortunately, apart from those two monsters (and the slightly boring but not bad No God's a Man), the rest of the album is much more pleasant and interesting to my ears. The standout for me is the most 'normal' of these, the GORGEOUS keyboard-based ballad Aspirations. Yup, my pop-sellout-whore ears are once again drawn to one of the band's high quality ballads, with Kerry wooing us with his delicate angel voice in a still decidedly untrivial vocal melody, with all sorts of moody electric piano tinklings and the band allowing itself some actual resonance.
That I love the 'simple' song of the album, though, in no way means that I'm snubbing the more complex stuff. Proclamation is a terrific, herky-jerky way to start things off - that dissonant electric piano riff, with a dissonant vocal melody to match, manages to be disturbingly catchy in its own prog-funk way, and all the usual wanking doesn't hurt things at all. I could take or leave the ULTRA-discordant sung mid-section, but I have to admit that it fits the flow of the song well, making it a sort of dialogue between the new ruler and his pious followers. Similarly, Playing the Game has its own catchy vibes-and-guitar duet theme (with a funk effect on the bass), with another great (and unintentionally poppy) vocal melody to match, with some more lovely atmosphere spread here and there. And finally, aside from the closing Valedictory (a good reprise of Proclamation), there's The Face, where the violin-guitar duels of yore rear their head once more. Possibly the best jam of the album, possibly not, but a decent enough way to wind things down, even if the jam is a little overlong.
So in short, I actually like this album a lot more than I thought I did (it took a zillion listens before it got even this high for me), but it's still well below the standard GG had previously established in my mind. The balance of complexity and listenability that they'd mastered well in the beginning was getting dangerously skewed here, and that they avoided total disaster here is a testament to the innate talent of the band, even if it wasn't always used in its best way.
Nick Pulliam (nickpulliam.resonetics.com) (01/23/06)
It took me all of one listen to get into this album. I think it is
far from the most difficult GG album to digest (that honor for me
lies with "Aquiring The Taste"). The only song I think is actually
discordant is "So Sincere" which to my ear is an experimental song
that is just no fun to listen too. That leaves 8 other tracks
(including the good bonus track "Power and Glory") that range from
pretty good "No God's a Man" to the outstanding "Cogs in Cogs",
"Proclomation", "Playing The Game" and "Aspirations". I would give
this album a high 8 with 1 whole point deducted for "So Sincere"
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. This is an all-time
favourite of mine in the GG catalogue. Sure, they probably pushed the
envelope more on this album than any other in terms of odd
arrangements and dissonance, but it works for me. All right, maybe
"So Sincere" goes a little over the top in the dissonance stakes but
I love the middle sections of "Proclamation", I feel they give the
rest of the song a counterpoint. "Cogs In Cogs" sweeps me up in its
seeming perpetual motion. Every other song is great too. For me, a
triumph.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
Now this is a serious let down. There are even less original ideas than on
its predecessor. Still I cannot betray my supersnobism: I like the most
hated songs best. McFerrin's album favourite at the other hand is a complete
bore. So let me focus on what I think is the good stuff.
The opener is excellent. The lack of emotionality doesn't bug me here as it
pictures a heartless man proclaiming himself king. The Hail, hail chanting
(it's almost pronounced like Hell, hell) is quite spooky. The jam is only
superficially repetitive thanks all the nice variations. Of course the
dissonant vocal mid-section pleases my ears - no better way to put the
corruptive nature of power on music. It's very unsettling and that's another
way to appeal to my emotions.
So Sincere is the logical follow up - just even more extreme. Again this
song hints at GG's best album. The King may try to convince himself that he
has the best intentions, but GG makes very clear that they are fake. The
listener must appreciate its atonality of course. I certainly do. After two
generic pieces Cogs in Cogs captures my attention again with its pure
aggression. Derek Shulman sounds pissed off. The complicated main riff is
excellent. It also has a good, but not exactly catchy melody, underlined
with loud chords in an untrivial rhythm. It also helps that the band plays
with a lot of energy. Finally I also like Valedictory which has another
excellent riff. Unlike on the previous album Gary Green manages to play all
kinds of variations. Of course the references to Proclamation make the song
also interesting. Note how the key line "Hail.."is cut off at the end.
My problem is that there is way too much trite on The Power and the Glory. I
just happily disagree what is trite and what not. I blame Phil Shulman's
absence for this decline. He for sure wouldn't have allowed it.
marc white (marcwhite29.icloud.com) (05/13/16)
This is one instance where my music tastes differ from yours. I think this album is amazing. However, I also listen to George Crumb.
Best song: Anything on side one
Indeed, the first half of this album is nigh unto perfect, easily my second favorite side from the band (my favorite, of course, is side one of Octopus). I guess that there could be more Green and less Minnear (Kerry has somehow carefully snuck his way into the dominant instrumentalist of the band, for better and less for worse, sort of), but otherwise it would be hard to come up with complaints. Just the Same gets off to a startling beginning, with snapping fingers (Those pop sell-outs! They should change their names to Alterna-Giant or Gentle-Gianternative!), but on the other hand, they're alternating from channel to channel in an untrivial rhythm, so I guess it's not that shocking. But then you hear this bouncy keyboard line that bleeds poppiness (until you realize it too is going off a bizarre rhythm), then it's echoed by guitar chords that bleed poppiness (with the same realization), then Derek sings a catchy-as-hell (but not conventional) vocal melody while all sorts of strange things are going on underneath to ... poppy effect. Yup. On paper, this combination of raw elements would look anything but memorable, but sure enough, they pull it off. Of course, it also has a bunch of nice atmospheric mid-sections, some with Gary playing slow and pretty lines, some dominated by sax-keyboard jams, none of which manage to detract from the "main" song material or seem particularly 'tacked-on.' Great stuff.
Next up is On Reflection, which has hands down the most spectacular group vocal arrangement by any art-rock band (heck, I'd say any band, but given that I'm writing this on Alleve, I don't trust myself to make total absolute statements at the moment) I've ever heard. They manage to convey a major medieval atmosphere with vocal lines that would make any modern classical composer proud, and the way they intertwine with each other, both melodywise and in the timbre of the members' individual voices, is something that I find myself coming back to again and again on this album. Of course, it's also multi-part, so there are multiple themes in which these amazing harmonies get to frolic, with reprises of the opening coming at just the right points. Yet as great as this track may be, it does not overshadow its successor, the side-closing title track. The opening is a terrific example of how complexity can still be beautiful, and the main song part, which is basically some sort of preverted progressive funk, has to be one of the best combinations of "tweaked" and "memorable" the band ever came up (that's a high compliment, of course). It's screaming out for a go-nuts guitar solo in the middle, which unfortunately never comes, but I definitely don't mind much while listening.
Unfortunately, the second side doesn't entertain me as much as the first (else it would get the band's top mark hands down). Time to Kill would sound great on, say, The Power and the Glory, but coming out of the shadow of the title track, it doesn't grab me much. Then again, even when I listen to the second side on its own, the track doesn't strike me as particularly impressive - just a decent, strange pop song. Likewise, while I like the jig-atmosphere of the closing Mobile quite a bit, not to mention parts of the melody, it still doesn't make me jump up and down for joy. As for the other two, Talybont is an ok keyboard-driven instrumental (I'll say this at least - it beats the snot out of the instrumentals on Genesis' Wind and Wuthering), but man, you don't know how much I find myself longing for some trumpets or cellos or glockenspiel. Still, this is the side that has The Last Voyage, which starts out sounding like something I'd expect on a good Steve Hackett solo album, then gets weird like all GG does inevitably does, but always remains purrty.
All in all, then, it's definitely one of the better GG albums out there. It definitely shows a regained focus at making music that makes sense while still being weird, as opposed to the last album, where the weirdness was mostly running the show. Unfortunately, the balance was about to come undone again, to ill effect.
Nick Pulliam (nickpulliam.resonetics.com) (01/23/06)
This is my favorite GG album and it gets the coveted "10" score. I
like every track on this disk and now that I have the remastered
edition I can appreciate these songs so much more. Normally
remastered disks don't show too much improvement over their older
versions- not so with Freehand, the improvements are easily heard and
stunning. A great album made at the band's peak.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
And they just get better and better. You can't start an album off
better than "Just the Same", "On Reflection" is definitely the best
display of their vocal counterpoint they ever recorded and "Free
Hand" rocks big time whilst keeping the classic GG sound. Like
Octopus, the 2nd half can't quite live up to the 1st but is still
wonderful stuff. The last truly great GG studio album.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (04/13/11)
An improvement, but not that much. Side 1 and especially On Reflection
sounds lame, but would rule in a live setting. Some people need to
(re)listen to the fugues of Bach and Beethoven. A fugue is meant to be
energetic, something like a whirlwind on music, with the main theme going
through all the instruments. GG fails completely here with a flat delivery.
The boring pseudo-medieval midsection drags the song even more down.
Then I greatly prefer the strange mix of medieval play (woodwinds) and rock
(guitar and bass) on Talybont. It's a bit too repetitive to be truely great.
Mobile is a fine combination of a Celtic dance tune and boogie, with the
usual twists added. The last Voyage is another beautiful and emotional
ballad, but it doesn't reach the beauty of Think of me with Kindness.
Moreover I'm not sure if with the angelic vocals all those complicated busy
rhythms are necessary. I'm not crazy about the instrumental section either.
The brilliancy of Octopus and to a lesser extent of In a Glass House is
still lacking, but fortunately would come back on the next album.
Best song: I Lost My Head
The biggest problem, as the band members themselves have more or less admitted, is that the record was made far too quickly. The band was apparently contractually obligated to get the album out at a specific time, but instead of taking the time to go into the studio and mull over ideas they might hammer out, they instead kept touring (it's hard to blame them, as it was by most accounts their most successful tour yet). Hence, the band, which could afford haste in the recording process much less than most, had only about a month to make their Free Hand followup. The band tried to make light of their stressful situation (from the liner notes: "Bassist Ray Shulman said: 'It's OK ... it'll be completed soon after release!', while brother Derek thought they would be 'doing the overdubs in the record shops.'"), but there can be little question that it had an ill effect on them. The Gentle Giant form is there, but there's very little in the way of creative advancement or true inspiration (as opposed to using already established successes as cribnotes). I mean, for a band whose main strength is not in melody (in a traditional sense), but in throwing out twisted, eye-opening and genre-bending ideas, that's a near fatal blow.
Fortunately, while I'm not terribly enthused about most of the tracks on here, I'm also not offended by most of them. Most of them, that is; I never ever ever want to hear Design again. Now, please bear in mind that I love both Knots and On Reflection, so it's not as if I have something against the band making a piece where the front-and-center feature is the vocal harmonies. But, you see, I have no use for the band displaying its ability to sing atonal harmonies simply for its own sake - I can almost tolerate it when Kerry starts singing over the background near the start, but even that's spoiled when Derek starts singing in a different key (over the up-and-down backing harmonies), and then the band starts singing some of the most unlistenable note sequences (I refuse to call this crap a melody) I know of over chaotic (but not involving like so many of the band's chaotic moments) percussion. I can barely even believe this is Gentle Giant when I hear it - it really sounds like a sick, mocking parody of the band, possibly done by some anti-prog vehement hater of the band.
The rest is mostly alright, though. Another Show has some major aggressive kick to it, with Derek singing a desperate vocal melody over all sorts of complex organ patterns. I could do without the wanking between sung parts, which seem to just be there to get the song up to three minutes, but given additional time and care, this could have become a minor classic for mid-period GG. The opening title track also has a lot of energy, alternating between a solid organ pattern with Derek's crooning over it, some decent instrumental parts between verses (though a lot of them really sound like outtake sequences from the Octopus sessions) and this goofy piano-driven line with Kerry singing something totally unrelated. Plus, it has some truly fine lyrics when I listen for them - it's a shame my two-fer doesn't have a lyric sheet.
I should also give credit to Give it Back, which has the band doing its own perverse take on reggae. Kerry's vibes are perfect for playing along with the Carribbeany vibe, and there's even an occasional, vaguely resonant rising guitar line that helps things a bunch. Of course, much of the rest is totally automated dissonance-by-numbers, but the main material is still quite good nonetheless. And finally, the album closer, I Lost My Head, starts with a bizarre (but strangely warm) Kerry vocal melody over a bizarre folksy instrumental feel (I guess what they're doing could theoretically be called a melody, but ...), before turning into an intense rocker that has a great catchy vocal melody ... once you get yourself to sing along to it while shutting your ears from the instrumental parts underneath, which have nothing to do with it. I'm not complaining, though - the seven minutes somehow pass almost unnoticed, which the band couldn't always pull off even in its prime.
Anyway, there are a couple of other songs that don't do much but aren't that nasty (Empty City starts off pretty and then loses it by not being totally sure what it wants to do, while Timing manages to be disturbingly enjoyable while on despite how ear-piercing many of the instrumental parts are). I actually think that, given their normal time-table for recording, the band could have made these songs just as enjoyable as their average mid-period material (which isn't always stellar but is usually at least decent) - as is, I see it as a good chance wasted. I also think, though, that it's no wonder that the band completely changed its direction for its remaining studio albums - except for the brief dalliance with reggae here, these songs say almost nothing new for the band, and you won't get me to think for a minute that the band didn't notice that.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
I see this as a transitional album, preparing the public, and perhaps
themselves, for the commercial change that was to come. The song
structures are just as complex as on previous albums but there is a
noticeable drop-off in the use of what I would term the
non-conventional rock instrumentation. Also, the songs just aren't as
strong as the previous albums (mind you, to keep writing such
challenging and yet entertaining material must be beyond mere
mortals, even GG). I enjoy this album, but nothing really stands out
to me except "I lost My Head" and, if I'm in the right mood,
"Interview".
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (05/13/11)
Didn't I write that GG is not for softies? Here you are, even the fans have
problems digesting this album. Didn't I write that I'm a supersnob? So I
recognized the sheer genius of Interview the very first time I heard it. It
has a firm place in my top 10. I don't pretend that I grasped it entirely
immediately. I am not sure if I grasp the entire album now after 10 or 20
listenings. That only adds to my fascination. But I do grasp a few things.
It's the most emotional album GG released. It's the most extreme album in
terms of dissonance. It already hints at the simplification that would come,
as form is simpler and closer to traditional pop/rock than any album before.
Every single song is structured along the lines of the stereotypal ABABCAB
scheme. A is the verse; B is the chorus and C is the instrumental
mid-section. The fact that several songs, if not all, have an extended coda
doesn't essentially change this.
Let me begin with the most hated song here, Design. So we have another
lovely melody (also a lovely background choir btw). Then a second lovely
melody is superposed on it. As the two melodies have no relation to each
other at all in terms of harmony the result is ugly - on purpose. The
logical question is why they did do it. The answer is of course a big Fuck
You to the record companies and the main public, who demand simplicity and
catchiness. Design provides double simplicity and catchiness in such a way
that it becomes completely fake. Concentrate on one melody and the other
will nag on the background, continuously reminding the listener of its
double standard - the double standard of the world GG lived in. So the Giant
is not Gentle anymore, he is faking being gentle, but deep down in his heart
he is utterly bitter. Such bitterness hasn't been heard since a very long
time. It's certainly far more bitter than all punk that soon would break
through. This point is only confirmed by the two violent instrumental
sections, which are mainly based on the brilliant percussion. This is the
musical equivalent of the Who or Led Zep destroying hotel rooms. Anyone
calling Design soulless has rather missed its point. How I love this song..
The opener Interview has a relatively simple and quite catchy riff combined
with a memorable angry melody. The instrumental parts have lots of nice
dissonants - if you can tolerate them. The limp reggae of Give it Back is
hilarious. Gary Green excels like hardly ever before. After the relatively
mellow Design we get another energetic angry song, Another Show. It's riff
may not be that good, the arrangement with the glissando's is unique. Empty
City shows some gorgeous acoustic work in the intro; similar to Memories of
old Days, but far more inventive. Its bimelodicity is far less shocking than
that of Design. The quick build-up to pissitude is very convincing. Timing
is the relative weakling due to its melody, though the violin play is great
and Gary Green plays an excellent solo. The album ends on an extremely high
level again. I lost my Head has a simply gorgeous and still absolutely
non-trivial arrangement, the only time the band refers to its Renaissance
stick. The melody is very sensitive, until it returns to the opener, thus
providing a nice feel of symmetry. The development of its main theme differs
completely; as such the band remains true to its classical roots.
In short, the listener that can get over the multitude of dissonances will
recognize how much simplified form is, how many great melodies there are and
how many emotions boil just under the surface.
Interview is one of my favourite rockalbums of all time.
Mark Terrell (mark.terrell2.btinternet.com) (01/13/13)
Interview Gentle Giant album and Design is a beautiful song. If you don't like chaotic, then you really shouldn't be listening to
Gentle Giant! Actually, the percussion isn't chaotic, it is very rhythmic and uses (as does a lot of GG percussion) lots of
different instruments. The melody is a melody, jumpy, yes, but still a clear melody.
Best song: Most anything
Just kidding, of course. This is a terrific live album, and probably the best introduction to Gentle Giant one can find on the market. Except for that particular horror (which actually has some decent jamming it, and a drum solo that's not so great but still sounds genial compared to the actual song), the track-listing is nearly ideal, and the performances are just stupendous.
The greatest thing about this album, and consequently the greatest thing about the band's live abilities, is that (unlike so so so many other bands of all kinds) they know how to preserve the essence of their studio recordings while changing much of the form for live performance. The songs are basically the same as in the studio, but the band members don't really show much of an over-attachment to all of the minutiae of every last note of the studio versions. Hence, all sorts of small changes are made - some jamming is cut (The Runaway is shortened considerably, yay), some is added (Funny Ways is seven minutes), some vocal sections are replaced with instrumentals (the middle "pretty" section of On Reflection, largely because Kerry felt uncomfortable singing live), and basically things are shuffled around enough to make the tracks anything but an indulgent replication of studio material. They're even kind enough to provide a fifteen minute medley of Octopus excerpts, starting with Boys in the Band (briefly), throwing in mostly acoustic renditions of Dog's Life and Raconteur, randomly inserting a snippet of Acquiring the Taste, doing the whole Knots thing with the expected precision, and capping it off with Advent of Panurge. Who could ask for anything more?!
Anyway, I can't write a very long review of this, unless I want to go into lengthy expositions on every little difference (I gotta say one thing, though - Free Hand finally got the blazing guitar solo in its midsection that I always wanted, whee) from the studio albums. I will say, though, that it would be exceptionally difficult to think of a better overall introduction to the band's hyper, jerky style. One complaint that one could raise is that they almost completely ignore the atmospheric aspects that they once pulled off exceptionally well, but on the other hand that might not have come across as well live, so I guess I can't complain. Get this regardless, and if you start to twitch during So Sincere, just hit the >> button and enjoy the bliss of Free Hand.
brian.mail.math.ucsb.edu (12/15/03)
A great introduction to the band's live sound (and to some of their later prog
tracks I don't quite possess, but will hopefully soon). Great energetic and yet
tight performances abound. It's really hard to comment on the tracks as they
seem similar to their studio counterparts (from what I know), though they
breathe a bit more easily on stage! (If only "So Sincere" were replaced by
another song...) 9(12).
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
A fabulous live album from a fabulous live band, what more can or
needs to be said? Oh yeah, this needs to be said - you have to see
these guys play live. If you don't already have them, get the two
official GG DVDs, On The Box and GG at the GG. Derek is such a
charismatic frontman, and watching the band swap instruments, not
only between but in the middle of songs, has to be seen to be truly
appreciated. They may not have had the big light shows or anything
like that but they were a genuine spectacle.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (05/13/11)
One of the great features of all early 70's bands is that the music on stage
deviates considerably from the music in the studio. These esthetics go back
to John Mayall of course, who instructed Eric Clapton to play a different
solo for each song each evening. There are several later bands I like very
much, but beginning with Yes every band tried to reproduce the studio
originals as close as possible. Imo thus one of the real advantages of rock
to classical music is done away with. GG stood for a dilemma. With their
compositions worked out in detail and without much room for jamming they
didn't have the liberty of Deep Purple. Moreover they didn't have any solist
who was able to hold the attention too long. Still they wanted to bring
something new in live settings. As always their solution was original:
recompose and mix several songs in medleys. Clever guys as they were they
made the right choices as well, except one.
For once I have to agree. I can't tolerate this version So Sincere either.
In fact the boring drum solo is a kind of relief. The band adds expression
to their delivery, which is completely out of place. It was the insincere
coldness of the song that always attracted me. Moreover they try to rock,
while the mathematical precision of the studio original was the other main
feature. You can't play So Sincere sloppy without ruining it.
The other medleys are brilliant. GG's atmospheric stuff was never the first
thing to attract me, so I certainly won't complain there is little of it.
Instead I'll point out that the band plays with a lot of energy and
expression. There is no sterility, no soullessness, no coldness at all. I
can't imagine that the band fails to trigger McFerrin's heart (or anybody
else's) on this album. It certainly does mine.
The opener Just the same is already a perfect example, cheeful and energetic
as it is. Gary Green has a biting approach. Proclamation is improved as well
- note the tight rhythms. Note the splendid acceleration near the end too.
On Reflection rules. This is what a fugue is about: dizzling the audience.
The renaissancelike (Ritchie Blackmore, this how this stuff should be done)
intro works great as a contrast with its delightful violin. The audience
fortunately is low in the mix, but when you can hear it it's clear it goes
nuts. Note how the introductory theme returns with a vengeance.
Starostin is right that shortening Boys in the Band works in its advantage;
there is some true pyrotechnics in the instrumental snippets (Page and Howe,
this is how acoustic noodling should be done to drive the audience crazy).
Man, does Knots kick butt. It gets the Deep Purple approach: a bit faster
and more aggressive than strictly necessary. This applies to the entire
medley.
Funny Ways gets more contrasts than the original, so both the introspective
and powerful parts are full of expression. How do you mean lack of emotion?
When listening to that beautiful violin during the last verse? Followed by
some fantastic drumming?
In a glass House gets the same approach as well, making the dissonances more
biting. There is some blistering guitar work by Gary Green at the end.
Free Hand allows me to point out what a fantastic bass player Ray Shulman
was. Can anyone listen to this and maintain that Chris Squire, JP Jones and
Gary Thain were superior? Gary Green gets the opportunity to shine on wah
wah. The short drum solo at the end makes So Sincere once more superfluous.
Finally the band leaves all restrictions behind on Peel the Paint as well;
neither does it forget to include some reflective interludes. The vocal
melody is weaker compared to the other songs, but the riffs/themes and the
arrangement is great as on the entire album. Only I lost my Head is slightly
inferior to the original as it loses its sensitivity; then again, the
original was impossible to surpass anyway.
Apologies for being so lengthy; at the other hand McFerrin was way too
short. If it weren't for So Sincere this possibly would be my absolute
favourite album of all time.
Best song: um
It's good, though. Naturally, there's a substantial amount of overlap with Official Live, but the performances are just as firey and energetic and clever as before, so I don't mind. Plus, it contains live versions of three Interview tracks not found on Official (I Lost My Head was there, but not here), so it at least has some individual value. The performances of those tracks aren't particularly amazing, but they're solid nonetheless, and reaffirm my belief that, somewhere in there, there could have been quite a good album. Interview has just as much dissonant delight as before, Give it Back amply shows that GG could handle most any genre they decided to put their minds to, and Timing ... well, the song itself is ok. However, it's capped off with a lengthy violin solo that may be overlong but nevertheless has quite a number of entertaining bits (he plays Three Blind Mice!). Plus, if nothing else, the first few seconds of Free Hand sound simply friggin' amazing, as they have Ray's violin providing the initial lead-in to the track before Kerry takes over with his keys. I dunno, there's just something so delightfully Crimsony about that moment that I can't help but be pleased.
Anyway, don't hunt high and low for this, but if you find it as cheap as I did, grab it.
Best song: Memories Of Old Days
As for the other side of the coin, the band showed with this album that great prog artists don't necessarily make great pop artists. I recall from a few weeks before writing this review that a discussion popped up around an idea I'd seen bantied about many places before, namely that since classical is denser and more complex, any good classical composer could sit down and in five minutes come up with a perfectly good, catchy pop song. Well, this album is a good example of one thing that's neglected by many proponents of that argument - even if, for the sake of argument, coming up with a catchy tune is easy, there is absolutely no guarantee that the artist will demonstrate any taste. There are a good number of decently memorable melodies on this album, yes, but many of them are either so formulaic or banal or cheap that I just can't stand it. So much of this album sounds like the product of a band that has utter contempt for "normal" rock music, that has no real appreciation of the genre but that thinks they can pull something off of high quality any way because they are *artists*.
Now, I don't want to give the impression that this album is the worst thing in the world, because it isn't. There are quite a few nice parts here and there (or maybe not, and they just stand out from the dung). Memories of Old Days drags on too long for my tastes, but it's extremely lovely in more than a couple of spots, especially near the end of the intro (I really like the slow keyboard parts), and it has such a nice atmosphere throughout that I can forgive it. I also enjoy the hell out of the boogie-rocker Betcha Thought We Couldn't Do It (indeed), with its fine guitar solo in the middle, as well as (to a lesser extent) the opening Two Weeks in Spain, with its bizarrely poppy, punchy guitar line that must have given a heart attack to GG fans the first time they heard it. I also like some bits of other songs, like the pleasant initial melody of the obligatory Kerry-sung piece (As Old as You're Young) or the percussion of Winning (which otherwise stinks) and the proggish intro to the closing For Nobody (which becomes boring as hell afterwards). So yeah, the album isn't a wasteland.
The other three songs, though, just make me grip my head in pain. I'm Turning Around starts off more-or-less ok, but as soon as it turns into a massively generic AOR monster-ballad, I find myself shuddering and begging for the end of this four-minute torment. Then, after Betcha Thought, we hit a couple of tracks that, for me, prove my theory that these guys really didn't know what the heck they were doing. Who Do You Think You are? is a MISERABLE mid-tempo rocker that pretends to be this cool, swaggering piece of music that really just makes me want to punch the band in its boring collective head, and Mountain Time is just about the very definition of what I'd consider bad rock music. Man, I can just imagine the band sitting around and suddenly going, "Hey, you know what would make this song better? Generic female backing vocals to go with our generic half-assed 'jazzy' melody! We're so hip!"
Anyway, there you have your half-assed "metamorphosis." I guess I could bump this up from a 6 to a low 7, but given that I only enjoy a third of the songs in their entirety, am ambivalent to a second third, and absolutely sickened by the other third, that would be a bit excessive. Only for completists (though completists would have to be hardcore fans, and no hardcore GG fan that I can imagine would be jumping at the bit to hear this).
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
Their weakest album, no doubt. I think this is due to its
schizophrenic nature, side one trying to be a pop album and side 2
trying to remain true to themselves but with the pop element sneaking
in. As I said in my overall summary, I have no problem with simple
music done well, and GG can do it well (not always on this album
though). I just think it's a shame that a band so distinctive and
unique had to sacrifice that which made them what they were. It
didn't work anyway - they attracted precious few new fans and
alienated the old ones. Lose-lose. Still, some good stuff to be heard
here. I know your favourite is "Memories of Old Days" and it is
lovely, but I am attracted to the quirky pop of "Two Weeks In Spain"
with its lyric about getting away from the cold of England and
"Betcha Thought We Couldn't Do It", which is so defiant about their
ability to make pop/rock records and their need to do so.
"Mark Nieuweboer" (ismaninb.gmail.com) (05/13/11)
Gentle Giant becomes poppy. The arrangements are still fine, but the
compositions are overall mediocre. The first exception is Betcha thought we
couldn't do it, which is even more hilarious and energetic on stage. Find
that version. As old as you're young has a nice riff and a fine melody. It
combines further simplified song writing with a very clever arrangement and
a nice melodic guitar solo. Memories of old Days drags a bit indeed, both in
the intro and in all the repetitions of the verses - something I am not used
to when it's GG. Nobody can deny its intrinsic beauty though, which comes
close to the beauty of previous ballads. For Nobody has a great intro
indeed, though it's already too repetitive. The vocal melody is not that
memorable, but very energetic. I like the chanting, but that intro comes
back too often. The guitar solo is nice, Ray Shulman's counterplay on bass
is better. Alas the chanting is repeated too. These songs are pretty good,
but certainly not more than that.
The last two regular albums are completely uninteresting imo. GG gets rid of
the clever arrangements as well and the great interplay is by far not enough
on its own. You may say that I'm prejudiced towards Giant for a Day, but
average pop/rock never was for me. Heck, I don't even own a single Beatles
record, even if I'll never deny the genius of the Lennon/McCartney/Harrison
combination.
marc white (marcwhite29.icloud.com) (05/13/16)
After listening to the first couple of tracks I thought, "maybe he's being a bit harsh on this record." Well, I continued to listen, and by your scale it would be a high six low seven on mine. By the time Mountain Time came on I was ready to turn it off, but I kept listening. Not horrible, but not great.
Best song: Words From The Wise
One big difference between this and the last album is that the long stretches of tastelessness that abounded on Piece are mostly eradicated here - some of the songs entertain me less than others, sure, but only one of them (the power ballad It's Only Goodbye) makes me wretch in disgust. Otherwise, the album's largely a fascinating exercise in style, one that shows the band occasionally using its experiences in other genres to influence the ideas shown here, without directly cribbing from their previous albums. For instance, we have the opening Words from the Wise, which starts off by showcasing the band's great vocal harmonies, but in a straightup poppy manner instead of the modern classical stylings of On Reflection. Even haters of this period of the band tend to like this song (probably because of those same vocal harmonies), even though its gloriously catchy (yet involved) verse melody and chorus bleed poppy goodness at all points.
Or, if you're a fan of the band's long stretches of no vocals, there's a hilarious instrumental called Spooky Boogie, which uses occasional quiet dissonant keyboard chords to provide a "scary" effect as an augmentation to the nice, jazzy melody. And if you're a fan of the band's ability to combine styles that should have nothing to do with each other, then the title track is for you. Vaguely punkish, with a simple nagging guitar/keyboard pattern driving it forward, as well as booming drumming, it shows a band willing to make a total fool of itself and come up with something extremely entertaining in the process.
The other songs are basically "conventional," but they're at worst nice and at best great, so I'm definitely in no position to complain. Thank You is an EXCELLENT acoustic pop ballad, with totally non-trivial chord sequences, a nice vocal performance from Derek (one thing I should note - I like Derek's voice more on this album than I did on the "classic" GG albums. Fancy that.), moving lyrics, and of course those little subtle guitar augmentations in the background. Little Brown Bag is a terrific, punchy rocker, with Derek bellowing in a convincing manner, Kerry sounding like he spent hours listening to Gary Brooker's playing on Exotic Birds and Fruit (another example of an art-rock band turning to a 'simpler' sound to great effect) and Gary's guitars sounding like Keith Richards pounding out those crisp lines.
I'm also quite partial to Friends, which is a solid two-minute acoustic ballad, with John Weathers (drums) on vocals, and all sorts of nice acoustic flourishes underneath the good vocal melody. And of course, there's the brilliant closer Rock Climber, which took me a couple of listens to like (don't know why), but that I'll likely enjoy for the rest of my life. Man, who would've thought that the prog band that would be able to do real rock'n'roll the best would be Gentle Giant, the band for people who thought rock'n'roll was retched'n'retarded...
The other two songs (Take Me, which has a nice chorus but that took me a zillion listens to remember how the song goes, and the nice-but-head-drooping No Stranger) aren't as good, but definitely not bad either. Add up these ten songs, and you have an extremely solid album that, through no fault of its own, completely fell between the cracks of history. Hardcore GG fans will probably hang me in effigy for liking this more than Glass House or Glory, but I really wish they'd reconsider and accept the possibility that there can, in fact, be such a thing as a very good pop album. Like, say, this one.
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
An all-pop record basically, and well done. I do enjoy it now (I
didn't at first) but it's still a little hard to believe that this is
the same band that brought us Free Hand and In A Glass House. It took
me some time to get over that mental prejudice I will freely admit
but, when I did, I found some good songs here - and some fairly
pedestrian ones too. "Words From The Wise" is probably their truest
and best pop song, those harmonies can still take me back to their
classic material even if they are soon rudely interrupted by a rather
cheesy synth bass. "Thank You" is a lovely acoustic ballad as you
said, but a little generic sounding to me. The title track has a bit
of the GG quirkiness poking through. Better than the previous album,
but not by much.
marc white (marcwhite29.icloud.com) (05/13/16)
I feel this is an under appreciated album. Really good pop/rock on here. Not the best I've ever heard, but better than music today by a long shot. Plus, the flow of the album is very well constructed. Good review.
Best song: All Through The Night
The really good news, if you're a GG hardcore, is that the album shows a significant departure from the happy, "simplistic" pop of Giant for a Day (of course, I liked all of that happy simple pop, but your mileage may vary). This is immediately shown in the opening Convenience (Clean and Easy) - the song is catchy (to me), and the rhythm is fairly straightforward, but the main keyboard/vocal melody has nice bits of discord, so no fan should immediately jerk up like they might have during Thank You from the last album. The song kinda reminds me of the Police's Omegaman, which would come out the following year, and given that that's one of my favorite Police songs, that can only be a compliment. Plus, it has decent lyrics, with subtle cynicism towards the "improvements" that modern life has given society (themes like this, the whole detachment from society bit, run through the whole album). Just a solid New Wave rock song, that's what that is.
Not as good as the following All Through the Night, though, which takes hundred of 80's metal bands to school with its incredible riff. Man, Gary may not have been as incredible chopswise as some of his prog counterparts (though he wasn't dreadfully far behind), but he really understood how to make his parts interesting, and above all (as songs like this show) he knew how to ROCK as well as most "regular" guitarists did. Of course, it's not just Gary's riff that makes the song so special, but rather there's also Derek's terrific delivery, especially in the chorus. I get a little bugged that the coda is dragged out too long, but that's a flaw I'm willing to forgive, especially since Kerry is kind enough to put some subtle key embellishments in the background near the end.
Most of the rest of the album, unfortunately, isn't quite as distinctive as this opening salvo, but that doesn't mean I dislike the tracks. It's just that this is a clear case of lack of diversity hurting an album, if only because I have to strain like mad to remember which song had what aspect to it. Ah well, it's no big loss. I may not remember Kerry's ballad Shadows on the Street start to finish, but I remember the melody being pretty, and I especially remember the lovely sound of his rolling keys coming out of the end of Night, providing a lovely contrast. I remember Underground sounding, as I was told it would, like a solid Police outtake, with a busy-yet-controlled bassline providing a good foundation, and with the guitars and keys leading the track through a few interesting themes. And hey, I remember I am a Camera largely beating the snot out of Yes' Into the Lens, if only because it has nothing like the momentum-killing "I am a camera *dead space*" chorus of that Drama piece. How it goes beyond that, except for the chorus, I have no idea, but that chorus is fun! And dig the actual camera noises that start and end the song!
Anyway, Number One is a decent robotic-sounding mid-tempo rocker, Inside Out is a nice ballad with a couple of really nice chord sequences (though the dissonance at times seems a bit out of place to me), and It's Not Imagination is a decent way to close out the LP version of the album. The point is, this is a perfectly decent album, if only for the overall sound, even if I can't totally put my finger on several of the actual songs. I wish that I could be privy to an alternate universe where the band made more albums after this, if only to see what they could further do in this direction, but I'll be perfectly satisfied with this.
OH! I forgot - the CD version of the album I have includes a FABULOUS bonus track in Heroes No More. I mean, maybe I'm just remembering the main keys/vocals chord sequence from somewhere else, and I'm transferring like for some other song to this, but in case that's not the situation, I just gotta say this is one of the loveliest New Wave melodies I've heard in quite some time. Yeah, that's worth a bump up from an 8 to a 9.
Goran Janicijevic (simplius.gmail.com) (05/27/07)
Oooh yeah, All Through The Night has such a powerful riff.... only to
transform into the sleaziest kind of corporate rock melody that was
poisoning us survivors from the 80-s... heh, Survivor was one of the bands
from that time, wasn't it? Exactly, Gentle Giant transformed into
unintentional doomsayers, they got the wrong side of the 80-s, unlike King
Crimson.
Indeed, the angsty Inside Out is the best song here - the only one deserving
to be on some GG compilation, and could be appropriate for, say, Duran
Duran. Everything else on Civilian sounds like manual instructions to be
Survivor, Loverboy, Toto, Mr. Mister and the ilk. The frontman actually
liked the times to come, became a record executive, and a culprit for some
musical abominations of the future decade.
Ignominious end of a band who brought us Three Friend and Octopus. 2/10
Daniel Bosch (bicycle.legs.optusnet.com.au) (12/13/08)
Another re-invention, this time as a rock/new wave band. I love New
Wave music but I don't think GG quite get there. All the songs are
enjoyable if you can forget the glorious past of this band but none
actually stand out to me. I still will put it on for a spin now and
again, though.
Best song: Whatever
The thing that struck me the most when listening to this the first time was just how relaxed the band seemed when playing these sessions. I actually considered this a significant fault at first - I wanted to hear the band working its ass off with this material, not casually sitting back and producing their works well - but the second listen (a couple of months later) changed that permanently. I'm really amazed at just how comfortable the band members are with their EXTREMELY complex and involved material, and the way they're able to do different, interesting things with it with a minimum of fuss. For instance, during the Octopus medley, you have no idea how much it does my heart good to hear the majority of Boys in the Band solely on acoustic guitar (with all the intertwining stuff and everything). Or how much I LOVE the fact that, in the middle of Advent of Panurge, the band's "recorder quartet" suddenly plays Yankee Doodle. Or, well, the way that the songs from the first side of Free Hand sound so danged fresh every time I hear them, no matter what album they're on.
Surprises in the track listing (for me) include a previously unreleased outtake from the band's earliest days, called City Hermit (which kinda blows, if you ask me - even Why Not? sounds like a better song from their debut), a lovely rendition of Isn't it Quiet And Cold? (a great thing, considering the scarcity of live tracks featuring Phil on vocals) and an expectedly pretty rendition of Aspirations (a surprise given that Kerry never sang his lead vocal parts in concert, though I guess BBC sessions aren't really concerts, so never mind). There's also a standard runthrough of Cogs in Cogs, which doesn't make me thrilled, but hey, it's still better than ten minutes of So Sincere ...
In brief (yeah, what else did you expect? Another attempt at an exposition on Way of Life? I need a life, people!), if you're looking for a quick and easy introduction to GG, your best bet is probably a live album. Playing the Fool is slightly better, in my opinion, but if you can't find that but see this, this should be grabbed asap. Strange prog bliss lies in store.
Gentle Giant - 1970 Polydor
B
(Very Good)
Acquiring The Taste - 1971 Polydor
B
(Very Good)
Three Friends - 1972 Columbia
A
(Very Good / Good)
*Octopus - 1973 Columbia*
D
(Great / Very Good)
In A Glass House - 1973 Alucard
9
(Good)
The Power And The Glory - 1974 Capitol
8
(Good / Mediocre)
Free Hand - 1975 Chrysalis
A
(Very Good / Good)
Interview - 1976 Chrysalis
7
(Mediocre / Good)
The Official Live - Playing The Fool - 1977 EMI
C
(Very Good / Great)
Interview In Concert - 2001 Glass House
8
(Good / Mediocre)
The Missing Piece - 1977 One Way
6
(Mediocre)
Giant For A Day - 1978 One Way
A
(Very Good / Good)
Civilian - 1980 One Way
9
(Good)
Out Of The Woods: BBC Sessions - 1996
C
(Very Good / Great)